Quote:
For a little perspective

300,000 people who were murdered in mass. This means multiple people usually hundreds sometimes thousands shot or gassed to death in mass over the last 30 years in Iraq.

that = 27 people every day for 10,950 days for nothing more than being in the wrong place at the wrong time or god forbid saying "sadam sucks".



I don't think many question that Sadam is good to have gone, but I think the real problems most of us are facing when it comes to this war is going to war under false pretenses and doing it without the support of most of our allies. That is, at least, what bugs the crap out of me. If having a much stronger coalition of UN allies we went to war, I'd be just fine with it.

There are lots of countries in the world that are lead by ruthless dictators who are commiting mass murder on their own people. Generally we don't go in and invade. For instance, China has the bloodiest history when it comes to their own people. Then N. Korea is a pretty modern example of a ruthless leader starving his people and stealing them blind and god knows what else. Probably a heck of a lot more countries doing it as well.

There are countries where civil wars have been waging for years and years killing as many people as Sadam ever killed. Why don't we do something about that?

How would you justify we do it to Iraq and not them? Just curious...
Panamah's Pet Peeve: It's incoming, not incomming!