OK Higar, try reading through the post again but this time remember two things.

1. Bush did not have a majority when he was elected and there is a lot of evidence to support the view that the voting was actually rigged in some areas of Florida by Jeb Bush which, if true, means that the US should currently have a different man as president anyway.

2. This latest news about the Bush administration deciding the Iraqi regime would be replaced no matter what and that the 9/11 tragedy was used as a mere smokescreen does call into question the general ethical capability of your governing head. Sure, there are a lot of functionaries in the government but isn't the president supposed to lead by example?

And Barge, don't be a cock. The arguments have gone from "We must retaliate against these clear threats to the US" to "We must retaliate against these possible threats to the future security of the US" to "We must do the right thing, and we're not saying if there is a threat or not". You can't avoid the argument by running away from the questions.

Unless your name is Bush or Blair, of course.