So because george bush's crime (which is equally as serious) didnt occur when he was president hes better for it? the question is if you have such moral issues, with illegal actions of presidents, then why support one who has commited a crime. I dont have a problem with either crime, because hte expectation of the almighty morality of a president is ridiculous. But you saying that clintons crime is worse because it was when he was in office, is silly. Lack of respect for legal statute was displayed by both men, and the time is irrelevant. Does it disappoint me that clinton "lied"? to be honest, not really, does it dissapoint me that GW drinks and drives, again not really. Why is that you may ask, because i realize that presidents just like you and every other person cant be moral or preserve utmost respect for the law? Can you really tell me that youve never violated any legal or moral statute?

Hastley
"who hopes you can realize that in reality presidents are not deities among themselves"